Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Starting to believe in Karma.

In 1 week Republicans have lost all ground to criticize Obama.
and here's 8 reasons why:

(UPDATE: I could make this a Top 10 list if I had added the Immigration flipflop and the say one thing do another attitude about keeping family members out of this.)

1. After Focus on the Family asks people to pray for epic rain during the DNC so that Obama's speech could not be delivered, the DNC experiences record attendance and record ratings all the while basking in perfect weather. While, the RNC is overshadowed by a hurricane following the same path as Katrina which laid bare the Bush administration management 3 years ago. (Oh, and I enjoyed my friend, Don Miller's little reference before his benediction at the DNC. Nicely done.)

2. After over half-a-year of Republicans belittling Obama's experience and calling him "not ready to lead" and touting John McCain as the experience candidate, Barack Obama chooses 36-year serving foreign policy expert Joe Biden. While, McCain chooses 20-month-serving Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate whose previous experience was serving as mayor of a town of 7,000, being runner-up in Miss Alaska, an undergrad degree in journalism from the Univ. of Idaho and whose foreign policy experience [according to Cindy McCain] is said to be her state's "close proximity to Russia" and who doesn't even "know what a VP does."
But don't you dare ask them about her limited experience as evidenced here.

3. After ludicrous attempts at undermining Barack and Michelle Obama's patriotism by Republicans from distractions like flag pins to Muslim lies, John McCain runs a "Country First" sloganed campaign. While, Sarah Palin's husband was a member of the Alaskan Independence Party (AIP), which since the 1970s, has been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can secede from the United States. And while McCain's motto is "Country First," the AIP's motto is the exact opposite -- "Alaska First -- Alaska Always." Palin even did the welcome message at the 2008 AIP Convention!


4. The party of family values tries to paint Democrats as out of line with "moral America" and selects Palin to secure values voters and social conservatives. Palin, who champions abstinence-only-ed as the "only solution," her teenage daughter Bristol begs to differ as she is pregnant by a self-proclaimed, "f--in redneck" who will "kick anyone's ass." If this had happened in the Obama family he would have been crucified by Republicans but when it happens in their own ranks this just "makes her more real," "she's just like us," and "she lives her values." The very objections that Democrats raise about Palin, conservatives hold up as talking points. Example:

Summer Vanderbilt is the youngest member of the Colorado delegation. The 21-year-old college student from Colorado Springs, a center of Christian conservative activism, says Palin's pregnant teenage daughter is making "a pro-life statement."

"It's a very interesting turn of events," she says, laughing. "Look, we have a very exciting party. We have a very exciting time. We've got a hurricane. We've got a baby. ... We're just having fun with all the different turns and we just don't know what's happening next."

- [from NPR] (click the link and listen to it with audio, much more "fun and exciting" that way. Summer's quote starts at 4:30 in)

5. After abandoning his once somewhat legitimate reform credentials in an "anything to win" blitzkrieg to the White House over the past year, McCain now seeks to re-brand himself as the "Reform" candidate and hopes Palin's record will bolster that...too bad he didn't seriously vet her. The governor's past practice on earmarks stands in contrast to the branded views of her running mate, as well as her initial support the infamous "Bridge to Nowhere" pork project, times spent as the director of a 527 group for indicted Sen. Ted Stevens, and her retention of his lobbying group in her campaign.

6. After years of sexist jokes toward Hillary Clinton from conservatives and even more years of opposition to equality protection laws for women, Republicans now have to pander to voters and pick a woman VP to try to shallowly pick up Clinton supporters for McCain to win and in doing so further insult and undermine women. (enjoy Samantha Bee's satire of this in the latter half of this Daily Show video on the Palin pick).

7. McCain. War Hero. Survivor of "Torture." Why is torture in quotes now? Well because apparently the McCain camp no longer calls it that. John McCain who as little as a year ago used to stand up against torture and decry it at all levels; McCain who "literally serves as the living embodiment" of the case against torture and has said, "One of the things that kept us going when I was in prison in North Vietnam was that we knew that if the situation were reversed, that we would not be doing to our captors what they were doing to us," has buckled on torture and now accepts it as long as you don't use THAT word. And in every speech last night supporting McCain at the RNC, Bush included, McCain's time as a POW in Vietnam now no longer includes "torture." Reason being: If it's put that way, if they describe what was done to McCain as torture, they have incriminated the Bush administration for war crimes.

8. And finally, and perhaps my favorite, Republicans have attempted over and over to tie Obama to every disreputable friend, co-worker, or acquaintance that he has ever known, met, or lived in the same state with. They even went so far as to create BarackBook, a Facebook type website to draw 7 degrees of Kevin Bacon attachments to Obama so as to attach the beliefs or actions of anyone and everyone to Obama despite evidence otherwise. The most obvious of these is of course the Jeremiah Wright spectacle which consumed the pundits talking points for a month and in which Obama could do no (w)right in conservatives eyes. Even with Hillary he had to famously "denounce" and "reject" Wright's comments as one verb meaning the same thing was not good enough. All the while, McCain was allowed to receive endorsements from all kinds of bigoted and xenophobic pastors from all walks of life. Meanwhile as of just TWO WEEKS ago, Sarah Palin sat in her Assembly of God church where a pastor gave this message:
Brickner described terrorist attacks on Israelis as God's "judgment of unbelief" of Jews who haven't embraced Christianity.

"Judgment is very real and we see it played out on the pages of the newspapers and on the television. It's very real. When [Brickner's son] was in Jerusalem he was there to witness some of that judgment, some of that conflict, when a Palestinian from East Jerusalem took a bulldozer and went plowing through a score of cars, killing numbers of people. Judgment — you can't miss it."
But apparently it would be unfair to attribute Palin's views to Brickner, though not Obama's to Wright's.

The complete and utter hypocrisy in all of this is astounding.

"I have to say that the 2008 Minneapolis Convention and the 1968 Chicago Convention have some eerie parallels. An unpopular war, a deeply divided country, and a ruling party having a mental breakdown on live television. In Minneapolis, in some kind of freak political weather system, all the centrifugal forces that have been tearing at the GOP for two decades now have merged. The veneer of a serious governing party is colliding with the reality of a theocratic, fanatic base. The pull of foreign policy realism is busting up against an unrepentant neoconservatism made even more extreme by the McCain candidacy. The whole collision makes one want to look away.

And when you see who may inherit the spoils of this disaster, we can only breathe a sigh of relief. The Democrats do not have their version of Nixon to swoop in, and triumph. They already have their Reagan.

(It was close though.)" - Andrew Sullivan [Atlantic]


Oh, and just for fun...here's Lieberman on Obama two years ago.

and Cheney on invading Iraq 14 years ago.

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

At 9:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can't help but be amazed at how cynical you can be towards Republicans, but totally oblivious to the fact that Democrats are engaged in the very same thing.

In your second point, you assert that Barack's selection of Joe Biden as his running mate is somehow indicative of his experience and readiness to lead. In reality, the selection of Joe Biden is totally irreconcilable with his platform of "change". Biden is just another member of the establishment, who's lapses in judgement are evident in a variety cases. He has slandered minorities (including Obama himself), grossly exaggerated facts (such as his claiming to have been shot at in Iraq during a democratic debate), and plagiarized during his earlier presidential campaigns.

As for the statement that Palin was a member of the AIP, that assertion has already been retracted (see http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080902/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_politics). She was never a member of the AIP. With respect to her position on earmarks and pork projects, while they may appear to be incompatible with the current Republican platform, it's important to note that this is not entirely out of step with Congressional politics as a whole. And while these positions are open to the public, Obama has sought to deter investigation into some of his own doings (see http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122005063234084813.html?mod=djemEditorialPage as just one example).

It's also important to note that the candidate who flaunts his ability to unify and discusses the virtues of his "post-partisan" brand of politics was unable to reconcile differences in his own party, most notably with Hillary Clinton.

In the end, no one (or at least very few) would claim that they are satisfied with W. Bush. However, he is neither of these candidates. To paint McCain as more of the same is somewhat laughable, as there are few in the Republican party who have had more contentious relations with the President than McCain. Ultimately the election is about the political philosophies underlying the policies proposed, not who can make better talking points. These are most questionable for the democratic candidate. As Thomas Hobbes noted in his work "Leviathan", societies exist when individuals enter a social contract with the guarantor of those rights. Those rights are best guaranteed not when state continues to extend its power over its citizens, but when it is restrained.

 
At 12:21 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Man, its amazing how dumb some people are. You really shouldn't be writing about politics. This is one of the misinformed things I've ever read.

 
At 12:29 AM, Blogger Matt said...

Well, kickyass has no points to make, so there's no sense in replying to that. Furthermore, only my friends read this blog, so I don't know why two people chose to post anonymously. I'd like to respond to the first post but would like to know who I'm speaking to first. You can just send me a private facebook message if you don't want it on here. Or maybe you just forgot to answer that section when posting. No worries, just let me know. - matt

 
At 6:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Re: what anonymous said...

Isn't it satisfying when conservatives try to quote Hobbes, and in the process reveal that they've read little more than the first two paragraphs of the Wikipedia entry on Leviathan?

-Mark

 

Post a Comment

<< Home